In re Marriage of Gambla & Woodson

853 N.E.2d 847 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Marriage of Gambla & Woodson

Illinois Appellate Court
853 N.E.2d 847 (2006)

Facts

Christopher Gambla (plaintiff), a Caucasian man, and Kimberly Woodson (defendant), an African American woman, married in May 2002 in Georgia and moved to Illinois. Kimberly had a son from a previous marriage, and the couple had a daughter, Kira, born in October 2002. In May 2003, Gambla filed for divorce in an Illinois district court, seeking sole custody of Kira. Woodson filed a counterpetition, also seeking sole custody of Kira. In May and June of 2005, the trial court conducted 15 days of trial. The trial court concluded that the fact that Kira is biracial was a relevant factor. The trial court noted that the court did not believe that Woodson should be awarded custody solely because she was an African American woman, but the court did find Woodson would be able to provide Kira with cultural knowledge that Gambla would not be able to do. The trial court thus awarded custody of Kira to Woodson but also entered a liberal visitation schedule for Gambla. Gambla appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership