Supreme Court of Colorado
574 P.2d 75 (1978)
The parties were married in 1968. During the course of their marriage, Mrs. Graham worked full time as an airline stewardess. Mr. Graham worked part time, spending most of his time completing his education. Mr. Graham received a bachelor’s degree and an M.B.A. during the course of the marriage. They accumulated no marital property during their marriage. The trial court held that one spouse’s education is jointly-held property in the marriage and therefore subject to equitable distribution. It awarded Mrs. Graham a sum of money, to be paid in monthly installments, to compensate her for her interest in her ex-husband’s education. Mr. Graham appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals, which reversed the trial court’s holding. Mrs. Graham then appealed the matter to the Supreme Court of Colorado.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lee, J.)
Dissent (Carrigan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.