In re Marriage of Heinzman

198 Colo. 36, 596 P.2d 61 (1979)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Marriage of Heinzman

Colorado Supreme Court
198 Colo. 36, 596 P.2d 61 (1979)

Facts

Beth Heinzman (plaintiff) occupied a residence as a tenant. The owner of the property intended to sell it, at which time Beth’s tenancy was slated to end. However, William Heinzman (defendant) purchased the property with the intent of moving in with Beth, to whom he gave an engagement ring and expressed an intent to marry. William executed a deed conveying the residence to William and Beth as joint tenants. Beth then moved elsewhere, ending the relationship. Beth filed for divorce. The court determined that there was no common-law marriage. The court also found that William had made a gift to Beth in the form of a property interest in the residence and that this gift was premised on eventual marriage between the two. The trial court ordered Beth to convey her interest in the property back to William—an order affirmed by the appellate court. Beth appealed, arguing that the heart-balm statute, which abolished causes of action stemming from the breach of a promise to marry, barred William’s ability to recover. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Groves, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership