In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B.
Court of Appeals of Texas
326 S.W.3d 654 (2010)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
J.B. (plaintiff) and H.B. (defendant) were legally married in a same-sex ceremony in Massachusetts. After their marriage, the couple moved to Texas. The relationship deteriorated, and J.B. filed a petition for divorce from H.B. The State of Texas (state) (plaintiff) intervened as a party to oppose the divorce pursuant to the state’s constitution, state laws, and the federal Defense of Marriage Act. Specifically, the state alleged that article I, § 32(a) of the Texas Constitution and § 6.204 of the Texas Family Code prevented the trial court from assuming subject-matter jurisdiction of the petition because the parties were not deemed to be married under state law. J.B. claimed that, pursuant to the marriage-recognition rule, Texas should recognize the valid Massachusetts same-sex marriage. The trial court denied the state’s claim without a hearing, concluding that § 32(a) and § 6.204 violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The State filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an interlocutory appeal with the appellate court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.