Supreme Court of Iowa
471 N.W.2d 869 (1991)
Dr. Ken Kimura (plaintiff) and Fumi Kimura (defendant), citizens of Japan, were married there in 1965. They ceased living together in 1973 and have two adult children. Dr. Kimura was granted a temporary visa to work in New York in July 1986. In October 1987, he was granted permanent United States residency and was then hired as a surgeon and professor at the University of Iowa. In December 1988, he filed for a divorce from Mrs. Kimura in an Iowa district court. Notice of the action was mailed to Mrs. Kimura in Japan and published over three weeks in an Iowa newspaper. In February 1989, Mrs. Kimura contested the court’s personal and subject-matter jurisdiction by way of a pre-answer motion. After a hearing at which her lawyer appeared, but Mrs. Kimura did not, the district court granted a divorce. Mrs. Kimura appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lavorato, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.