Supreme Court of Iowa
570 N.W.2d 103 (Iowa 1997)
Scott Nelson (defendant) and Jane Nelson (plaintiff) divorced in 1989. The Nelsons had two children. At the time of the divorce, Scott was in law school. The divorce decree ordered Scott to pay $137.50 per month in child support. In 1993, at Jane’s request, the trial court increased Scott’s child-support payments to $425. In 1995, Jane again petitioned for a modification of Scott’s child-support payments. Jane presented evidence that Scott’s income had increased from $15,000 in 1991 to $38,524 in 1994. Scott argued that he had to make car payments and law-school loan payments and could not afford increased child-support payments. Scott stated that his monthly expenses, including $425 in child-support payments, totaled $2,150 and that his net monthly income totaled $1,846. The trial court increased Scott’s monthly child-support payment to $695. Scott appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harris, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.