In re Marriage of Nelson

570 N.W.2d 103 (1997)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Marriage of Nelson

Iowa Supreme Court
570 N.W.2d 103 (1997)

SC
Play video

Facts

Scott Nelson (defendant) and Jane Nelson (plaintiff) divorced in 1989. The Nelsons had two children. At the time of the divorce, Scott was in law school. The divorce decree ordered Scott to pay $137.50 per month in child support. In 1993, at Jane’s request, the trial court increased Scott’s child-support payments to $425. In 1995, Jane again petitioned for a modification of Scott’s child-support payments. Jane presented evidence that Scott’s income had increased from $15,000 in 1991 to $38,524 in 1994. Scott argued that he had to make car payments and law-school loan payments and could not afford increased child-support payments. Scott stated that his monthly expenses, including $425 in child-support payments, totaled $2,150 and that his net monthly income totaled $1,846. The trial court increased Scott’s monthly child-support payment to $695. Scott appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harris, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership