In re Marriage of Ramirez

165 Cal. App. 4th 751, 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 180 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Marriage of Ramirez

Court of Appeals of California
165 Cal. App. 4th 751, 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 180 (2008)

Play video

Facts

Jorge Ramirez (plaintiff) and Lilia Llamas (defendant) took part in a Mexican marriage ceremony that was performed in California. However, Ramirez and Llamas never obtained a marriage license. The marriage was later declared void, because Llamas had not obtained a divorce from her previous husband. Ramirez and Llamas remarried and obtained a marriage license. During this time, Ramirez, who was a Mexican immigrant, sought legal residence in the United States. Ramirez’s mother sponsored Ramirez’s application for permanent resident and citizenship status. However, after the death of Ramirez’s mother, Llamas assumed the position of Ramirez’s immigration sponsor. After Llamas completed the necessary paperwork related to Ramirez’s immigration status, Ramirez informed Llamas that he wanted a divorce, because he was in love with another woman. Ramirez filed a petition for divorce from Llamas. Llamas later learned via telephone conversation that Ramirez had been having an affair with her sister since before their second marriage. During the telephone conversation, Llamas heard Ramirez assure her sister that they would be together once he obtained his share of money and property from Llamas and that he had only married Llamas to gain permanent resident status. The trial court found the second marriage to be void due to fraud relating to the fact that Ramirez married Llamas to secure a positive immigration status and that Ramirez had a preexisting affair with Llamas’s sister that he intended to continue. Ramirez appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ramirez, J.)

Concurrence (Gaut, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership