In re Marriage of Thornhill
Colorado Court of Appeals
200 P.3d 1083 (2008)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Antoinette Thornhill and Chuck Thornhill were married. Chuck owned 70.5 percent of an oil-and-gas-equipment business. Antoinette’s father was the chief financial officer (CFO) of the business. Subsequently, Chuck and Antoinette signed a separation agreement. Antoinette was not represented by counsel, but her father helped her negotiate the agreement. Antoinette lacked any independent financial expertise or knowledge of Chuck’s business. The separation agreement provided that Chuck would pay Antoinette half of the value of his share of the business, which amounted to $752,692, over a period of 10 years. The agreement did not provide for interest payments. By the time the Thornhills sought to finalize the divorce, Antoinette had disavowed the separation agreement, arguing that the agreement was unfair. The trial court upheld the agreement. Antoinette appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Terry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.