In re Marriage of Thornhill

200 P.3d 1083 (2008)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Marriage of Thornhill

Colorado Court of Appeals
200 P.3d 1083 (2008)

Play video

Facts

Antoinette Thornhill and Chuck Thornhill were married. Chuck owned 70.5 percent of an oil-and-gas-equipment business. Antoinette’s father was the chief financial officer (CFO) of the business. Subsequently, Chuck and Antoinette signed a separation agreement. Antoinette was not represented by counsel, but her father helped her negotiate the agreement. Antoinette lacked any independent financial expertise or knowledge of Chuck’s business. The separation agreement provided that Chuck would pay Antoinette half of the value of his share of the business, which amounted to $752,692, over a period of 10 years. The agreement did not provide for interest payments. By the time the Thornhills sought to finalize the divorce, Antoinette had disavowed the separation agreement, arguing that the agreement was unfair. The trial court upheld the agreement. Antoinette appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Terry, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 733,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership