In re Martin
Oklahoma Supreme Court
875 P.2d 417 (1994)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
John R. and Elsie B. Martin (debtors) were bankrupt and unable to pay the secured debts they owed Oklahoma Bank & Trust Company (bank), the federal Small Business Administration (SBA), and a state agency (creditors). The bank held liens on the Martins' farm and mineral rights, but the combined worth of those assets was insufficient to cover the Martins' large debt to the bank. The SBA held the sole lien on the Martins' homestead and a junior lien on the couple's farm. Either of these assets was sufficient to satisfy the SBA's claim against the Martins. The bank contended that the SBA should marshal assets solely from the Martins' homestead, leaving the farm fully available to help satisfy the bank's claim. However, the Martins objected on the grounds that Oklahoma law prohibited the bank from forcing the sale of their homestead. The federal bankruptcy court asked for the Supreme Court of Oklahoma's interpretation of the applicable law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simms, J.)
Dissent (Hodges, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.