In re Mastercard International Inc. Internet Gambling Litigation
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
132 F. Supp. 2d 468 (2001)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
In a class-action suit, two internet gamblers (plaintiffs) sued Mastercard International Inc. and other credit-card companies (together, Mastercard) (defendants) based on Mastercard’s role in processing payments for internet casinos or otherwise facilitating the occurrence of gambling via the internet. The gamblers alleged that they had placed various bets or wagers on different internet casino websites, made possible by Mastercard. The gamblers claimed that Mastercard’s conduct violated the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084, among other laws. Mastercard filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the gamblers had failed to plead that their bets were placed in connection with a sporting event or sports contest as required under the Wire Act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duval, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.