From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
In re Matter of Matthew F. Hale, Petitioner
Illinois Supreme Court
723 N.E.2d 206 (1999)
Matthew Hale (defendant) openly advocated racist beliefs. When Hale applied to practice law in Illinois, the Committee on Character and Fitness (the committee) (plaintiff) found that he was not morally fit to practice law and denied his application. The committee did not find that Hale had engaged in any conduct that justified denying his application. Instead, the committee based its decision on its finding that Hale’s views conflicted with the rules of professional conduct and that Hale would likely violate the rules at some point in the future. The committee also specifically decided that, for purposes of regulating an attorney’s professional conduct, protecting the constitutional considerations behind an individual’s First Amendment right to hold unpopular views was less important than upholding the constitutional considerations behind the fundamental truths of equality and nondiscrimination. Hale petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court, asking it to review the denial of his bar application.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
Dissent (Heiple, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.