In re McDonough
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
930 N.E.2d 1279 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
A defendant was charged with indecent assault of Ruby McDonough. At the defendant’s criminal trial, the prosecution called McDonough to testify as a witness. The defense objected to the testimony on the ground that McDonough was not competent to testify. Specifically, McDonough had suffered a stroke, which impaired her ability to speak. Neither the prosecution nor McDonough requested a reasonable accommodation to allow her to testify. The trial judge found McDonough incompetent to testify, ruling that McDonough’s testimony would not permit the defense a full right of meaningful cross-examination. The prosecution did not appeal this ruling. McDonough, however, as the witness, filed a petition for interlocutory review, asserting that the judge’s competency ruling violated her rights.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
