In re Mellors
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
372 B.R. 763 (2007)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Jason and Darlene Mellors (debtors) filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Their Chapter 13 plan was confirmed in December 2006. Prior to the bankruptcy, the Mellorses purchased a used vehicle. This was the Mellorses’ only vehicle, and Jason used it to commute to work. Coastal Credit (Coastal) (creditor) held a security interest in the vehicle. Under the Chapter 13 plan, Coastal’s claim was treated as secured to the extent of the value of the car, with the remaining portion of the claim treated as unsecured. Coastal’s secured claim would be repaid monthly over the life of the plan. In February 2007, the Mellorses learned that the frame of their vehicle was cracked and would have to be repaired before the vehicle could be driven. Although the vehicle had been inspected previously, the defect had not been detected. The Mellorses could not afford the repair. The Mellorses also could not afford to continue paying for the inoperable vehicle and financing a replacement vehicle at the same time. In March, the Mellorses filed an amended Chapter 13 plan. The amended plan provided for (1) the surrender of the vehicle to Coastal in satisfaction of Coastal’s secured claim and (2) Coastal’s sharing pro rata for its unsecured claim any distributions that any other unsecured creditors might receive. Coastal objected to confirmation of the amended Chapter 13 plan.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Deller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.