In re MFW Shareholders Litigation
Delaware Court of Chancery
67 A.3d 496 (2013)
- Written by Katherine Li, JD
Facts
Ronald Perelman (defendant) owned MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (MacAndrews & Forbes) (defendant). MacAndrews & Forbes held 43 percent of M & F Worldwide Corp. (MFW) stock and offered to buy the rest of MFW's stock. MacAndrews & Forbes said upfront that any going-private transaction would be conditioned on the approval of an independent special committee and a vote of a majority of the minority shareholders. An independent special committee was formed. The committee retained its own legal and financial advisors. It met eight times to negotiate with MacAndrews & Forbes and got the price raised a significant amount. The merger was approved by the special committee and an informed vote of a majority of the minority MFW shareholders. There was no failure of disclosure. MFW's public shareholders (plaintiffs) challenged the transaction, urging the application of the entire fairness standard. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that the standard of review should be the business judgment rule.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.