In re Muer
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
146 F.3d 410 (1998)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Charles Muer (defendant) owned a vessel that was transferred to the C.A. Muer Corporation (corporation). Muer was the captain of the vessel when it sank, killing Muer and three others. Robert Karbel (plaintiff), the representative of the estate of two of the victims, filed a wrongful-death action against Muer’s estate and the corporation. The estate and the corporation filed a complaint in federal court seeking protection under the Limitation of Liability Act. Karbel moved for summary judgment, arguing that Muer’s presence on the vessel barred any limitation of liability. The court ruled in the estate’s and corporation’s favor, and Karbel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cole, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.