In re Muller
Leipzig Supreme Court
16 Am. J. Int’l L. 684 (1922)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Muller (defendant), a Captain in the Reserve, was placed in command of a camp of English prisoners of war. Muller did not treat the prisoners as subordinates. Instead, Muller treated the prisoners as convicts, often hitting or insulting the prisoners as a way to maintain order in the deteriorated conditions of the camp. In addition, Muller often forced sick prisoners to work. Ultimately, instead of earning the prisoners’ confidence, Muller kicked and beat prisoners into following his orders. Even so, the court noted that Muller did not intend to be cruel or act dishonorably but was merely overexcited, feared disorder, and did not know how to handle men. After the war, Muller was tried for beating and insulting prisoners of war under his command.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.