In re Nance
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
556 F.2d 602 (1977)
Nance (defendant), a professional football player for the New England Patriots, had taken out a loan and in other ways had become obligated to Coolidge Bank and Trust Co. (Coolidge) (plaintiff). By September 1970, Nance was in arrears on his accounts and, after a meeting with Coolidge officers and making promises to pay, signed the “Assignment of Contract.” This assignment covered Nance’s “standard player contract” with the Patriots for the 1970, 1971, and 1972 seasons and stated that the assignment was for the purpose of providing collateral on the past-due accounts. Nance was transferred in 1971 to another team. By September 1972, Coolidge questioned the security for Nance’s obligations. Nance signed the “Declaration of Revocable Trust.” This document gave Coolidge, among others, absolute power over all amounts that the Patriots owed Nance at that time, which was money for the 1970 and 1971 seasons. One month later, Nance, at Coolidge’s request, consolidated all of his obligations and deposited the declaration as collateral thereto. By 1973, Nance was still not current. Nance remained overdue on his accounts despite subsequent meetings and promises to pay upon settling a wage dispute with the Patriots. In December 1973, Nance settled with the Patriots and paid a small sum to Coolidge, but he was still not current. Coolidge filed suit in state court seeking the unpaid balance of all obligations. Nance filed a petition in bankruptcy court, staying the state court action. Coolidge filed a petition in the bankruptcy court, seeking to have the unpaid balance declared non-dischargeable. The bankruptcy court found that Coolidge met its burden on the petition, which was to show the unpaid balance was its “property” that had been willfully and maliciously converted by Nance and therefore effectively assigned. Nance appealed to the federal district court. The district court held that the evidence supported the bankruptcy court’s finding, but that the assignment was ineffective because it did not comply with Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. Chapter 154. Coolidge appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.