In re Newark Airport/Hotel Limited Partnership

156 B.R. 444 (1993)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Newark Airport/Hotel Limited Partnership

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey
156 B.R. 444 (1993)

Facts

Newark Airport/Hotel Limited Partnership (Newark) (debtor) owned and operated a hotel near Newark Airport. FGH Realty Credit Corporation (FGH) (creditor) had a mortgage on the hotel. Newark defaulted on payments to FGH, and FGH obtained a foreclosure judgment against Newark in New Jersey state court. However, the foreclosure sale was postponed because Newark filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Following the bankruptcy filing, Newark operated the hotel as a debtor-in-possession and generated enough revenue to pay its expenses and make payments to FGH. The hotel continued to employ over 100 people and had ongoing contracts for private events and room guarantees for airline employees. Newark had also identified a possible funding source for its reorganization plan. Shortly after the bankruptcy filing, while Newark still had the exclusive right to file a proposed reorganization plan with the bankruptcy court (i.e., the exclusivity period), FGH moved in bankruptcy court under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(2), seeking relief from the automatic stay so that FGH could foreclose on the hotel. FGH asserted that Newark had no equity in the hotel and that keeping the hotel was not necessary to allow Newark to reorganize effectively. At the same time, Newark made a first request under 11 U.S.C. § 1121(d) for an extension of the exclusivity period. Newark claimed that the extension was necessary because there had been a delay in forming Newark’s official creditors’ committee, Newark had not yet been able to obtain an appraisal for the hotel, Newark had pending accounts-receivable claims against two airlines, and Newark was in the process of appealing FGH’s foreclosure judgment and a related counterclaim in state court. The bankruptcy court considered the motions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tuohey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership