In re Nicholas B. v. Bill B.

88 Cal. App. 4th 1126, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 465 (2001)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Nicholas B. v. Bill B.

California Court of Appeal
88 Cal. App. 4th 1126, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 465 (2001)

Facts

Kimberly and Bill B. (defendants) adopted Nicholas B. when he was six years old. In September 1998, when Nicholas was 13 years old, Kimberly struck Nicholas in the face. The incident was reported to the state (plaintiff), and the ensuing investigation resulted in Kimberly and Bill’s agreement to place Nicholas with a foster family with the goal of reunification. Kimberly and Bill began participating in the state’s reunification plan while Nicholas lived with a foster family. In March 1999, the state filed a petition for the court to find that Nicholas was a dependent child, alleging, among other things, that in an isolated incident in September 1998, Kimberly seriously injured Nicholas when she hit him in the face. The state did not allege that Kimberly was likely to abuse Nicholas again. Though Kimberly and Bill objected on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, the court heard the matter. The court found that Nicholas could not safely return to the custody of Kimberly and Bill and ordered Nicholas to remain with the foster family. Kimberly and Bill appealed, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wunderlich, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership