In re North End Timber Productions LLC

2007 WL 4468706 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re North End Timber Productions LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana
2007 WL 4468706 (2007)

JC

Facts

North End Timber Productions LLC (NET) (debtor) filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2006, which was converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2007. An adversary proceeding arose between three creditors in regard to $150,000 of insurance proceeds following a fire at NET. All three creditors had perfected security interests in all personal property equipment owned by NET. Three Rivers Bank of Montana (TRB) (creditor) perfected its security interest first, with Jobs Now, Inc. (JNI) (creditor) perfecting its interest second, and Johnson Brothers Contracting, Inc. (JBC) (creditor) perfecting its interest third. TRB and JNI were named as loss payees on the insurance policy, and while JBC was to be named under its security agreement with NET, it was not so named. Also, TRB and JBC entered a subordination agreement under which TRB agreed to subordinate its interest in certain machinery and equipment to JBC. It was agreed that $104,000 of the equipment destroyed in the fire was listed in that subordination agreement, with the remaining damage occurring to wiring and support structure at NET. TRB claimed it should take the $150,000, because it had first priority and did not subordinate its interest in insurance proceeds. Or, if the subordination agreement applied, it only applied to the extent of $104,000, and TRB should recover the remaining $46,000, based on having first priority. JNI argued that if TRB kept first-priority position, JNI would then receive any remaining funds as second in priority. JNI also asserted that if TRB had subordinated its interest to JBC, then JNI should move into first position and should receive all funds. Finally, JBC believed that it should receive first position subjected to the subordination agreement and should receive either the full $150,000 or the $104,000; JBC asserted no position as to the remaining $46,000. While there were several ancillary issues present, the biggest was whether JBC could leapfrog JNI for priority by virtue of its subordination agreement with TRB.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kirschner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership