In re Northern Michigan University Ripley Heating Plant

U.S. EPA, PSD Appeal No. 08-02 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Northern Michigan University Ripley Heating Plant

Environmental Appeals Board
U.S. EPA, PSD Appeal No. 08-02 (2009)

Facts

Northern Michigan University (NMU) obtained a prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permit from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to construct a new boiler on campus. The permit allowed the burning of coal with high sulfur content for 22 days or more per month, with wood being the primary fuel for the other seven days. The coal was to come from two suppliers. The suppliers of the wood were not named. In their analysis of the best available control technology (BACT)—a requirement designed to ensure the selection of the least environmentally harmful approach—NMU and the MDEQ cited limited storage space beyond what was set aside for the two coal suppliers. The BACT analysis also attempted to justify the preference of coal over wood by referring to seasonal disruptions in delivery. Although BACT criteria are typically based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) New Source Review (NSR) manual, the MDEQ relied heavily on its own state manual, which actually discouraged use of the NSR manual. The Sierra Club challenged the soundness of the BACT analysis before the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sheehan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership