In re Northlake Development, LLC
Mississippi Supreme Court
60 So. 3d 792 (2011)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
George Kiniyalocts and Michael Earwood formed Kinwood Capital Group, LLC (defendant). Kinwood’s operating agreement provided that transactions involving the company’s property must be approved by an affirmative vote of members holding at least 75 percent of the company. Earwood quietly formed Northlake Development, LLC as the sole owner. Earwood then executed a warranty deed as a member of Kinwood, conveying Kinwood’s property to Northlake. Northlake applied to BankPlus (plaintiff) for a loan secured by the property. BankPlus provided the loan, taking the deed of trust as collateral. Northlake later filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and listed the property as a Northlake asset. Kiniyalocts learned of Earwood’s actions and contested the deed. The bankruptcy judge concluded that Earwood had no authority to make the conveyance, and declared BankPlus’s deed of trust null and void. BankPlus appealed. The district court affirmed. BankPlus appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, contending that the deed was only voidable, not void, and enforceable in this instance because BankPlus took it from Northlake without notice that Earwood was unauthorized to convey it. The Fifth Circuit certified the question to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dickinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.