In re Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

348 N.L.R.B. 686 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board
348 N.L.R.B. 686 (2006)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Oakwood Healthcare, Inc. (Oakwood) (defendant) employed about 181 registered nurses (RNs), who provided direct care to patients in 10 different hospital departments. The RNs reported to various managers who were undisputedly supervisors under the National Labor Relations Act. Further, many RNs served as charge nurses; 12 RNs were permanent charge nurses, while others served as charge nurses on a rotating basis. Charge nurses were paid more than regular nurses and were responsible for overseeing their patient-care departments. The charge nurses assigned other RNs and staff to patients during the shift. There was no pattern for how an RN might serve as a rotating charge nurse, and some RNs did not ever serve as charge nurses. A labor organization (plaintiff) wished to represent all the Oakwood RNs, including the charge nurses, as one bargaining unit. The regional director of the National Labor Relations Board (the board) found that none of the charge nurses were supervisors within the meaning of the act and ordered an election to include all the RNs. The board reviewed the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (No information provided)

Dissent (No information provided)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership