In re Omne Partners II
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire
67 B.R. 793 (1986)

- Written by Laura Julien, JD
Facts
Omne Partners II (defendant) operated and managed a factory discount outlet mall located in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The development and financing of the mall property was a multiparty transaction, with a portion of the funding provided by the Northern New England Carpenters’ Pension Fund (the Pension Fund) (plaintiff). When Omne Partners first approached the Pension Fund for a construction loan, the Pension Fund rejected the request. Omne Partners then proposed a sale-leaseback transaction to ensure that the Pension Fund would have protection for its equity against foreclosure. The Pension Fund agreed, and the parties entered into a sale-leaseback agreement whereby Omne Partners transferred ownership of the mall property to the Pension Fund and the Pension Fund executed a 30-year ground lease with Omne Partners. Under the terms of the ground lease, Omne Partners retained responsibility for many of the typical obligations of ownership. On March 20, 1986, Omne Partners filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Consequently, the Pension Fund filed a complaint seeking the court’s determination of its rights concerning the mall property. The Pension Fund contended that Omne Partners’ rights under the lease had been terminated upon its filing of bankruptcy and that Omne Partners had unlawfully maintained possession of the mall property. Omne Partners denied the Pension Fund’s allegations and sought summary judgment on the basis that the ground lease was not a true leaseback agreement but rather a disguised financing agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Yacos, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.