In re Opinion No. 26 of the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law
New Jersey Supreme Court
654 A.2d 1344 (1995)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Real estate brokers prepare form contracts for buyers and sellers of real estate to execute, arrange for financing for buyers, order a title commitment, and obtain a deed drafting by an attorney selected by the broker. The brokers’ interest is always to close the transaction, which often conflicts with the interest of the buyer and the seller. In North Jersey, both buyers and sellers are usually represented by attorneys. However, in South Jersey, buyers and sellers often go through the entire transaction without obtaining attorneys to represent them. The cost of the transaction is thereby reduced. However, this means that the buyers and sellers have not been fully informed of the risks and consequences of the contract selling the property and have not been given competent legal counsel regarding any exceptions taken by the title company. The contract of sale does permit each party to revoke the contract within three days through counsel, if the party chooses to do so. Attorneys in New Jersey have asserted that the activities of the real estate brokers constitute the unauthorized practice of law and should be prohibited.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.