In re Orange County
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
183 B.R. 594 (1995)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Certain government entities deposited excess funds with Orange County (county) (debtor), which invested the funds in two Orange County investment pools and an investment account (collectively, the OCIP) (debtors). In December 1994, facing numerous withdrawal requests from many of its more than 200 participants, the OCIP filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy. The county also filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy. Three OCIP participants (participants) (creditors) moved to dismiss the OCIP’s Chapter 9 case on the ground that the OCIP was not eligible for Chapter 9 because (1) it was not a municipality within the meaning of Bankruptcy Code (code) §§ 109(c) and101(40), (2) California did not specifically authorize it to file under Chapter 9, (3) it was not insolvent when it filed for bankruptcy, and (4) it did not engage in prebankruptcy negotiations with its creditors.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.