In re Parmalat Securities Litigation

474 F. Supp. 2d 547 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Parmalat Securities Litigation

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
474 F. Supp. 2d 547 (2007)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Grant Thornton was an international accounting firm comprising a number of separate legal entities that used the Grant Thornton name. Grant Thornton International (GT-International) (defendant) created the policies and procedures for its member firms. Grant Thornton LLP (GT-US) (defendant) was based in the United States and was the largest member firm of GT-International. Grant Thornton S.p.A. (GT-Italy) (defendant) was a member firm based in Italy. GT-Italy conducted an audit of Parmalat Finanziaria, S.p.A. (Parmalat) during a period in which Parmalat allegedly committed fraud. Investors who had invested in Parmalat sued GT-International, GT-Italy, and GT-US. The investors sought to recover from GT-US under a theory of vicarious liability for violations of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5. GT-US filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that any false statement made by GT-Italy could not be attributed to GT-US, which was purported to be GT-Italy’s principal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership