In re Parmalat Securities Litigation
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
474 F. Supp. 2d 547 (2007)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Grant Thornton was an international accounting firm comprising a number of separate legal entities that used the Grant Thornton name. Grant Thornton International (GT-International) (defendant) created the policies and procedures for its member firms. Grant Thornton LLP (GT-US) (defendant) was based in the United States and was the largest member firm of GT-International. Grant Thornton S.p.A. (GT-Italy) (defendant) was a member firm based in Italy. GT-Italy conducted an audit of Parmalat Finanziaria, S.p.A. (Parmalat) during a period in which Parmalat allegedly committed fraud. Investors who had invested in Parmalat sued GT-International, GT-Italy, and GT-US. The investors sought to recover from GT-US under a theory of vicarious liability for violations of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5. GT-US filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that any false statement made by GT-Italy could not be attributed to GT-US, which was purported to be GT-Italy’s principal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.