In re Penn Central Securities Litigation

494 F.2d 528 (1974)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Penn Central Securities Litigation

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
494 F.2d 528 (1974)

Facts

Certain owners of shares (shareholders) (plaintiffs) in the bankrupt Penn Central Transportation Company (Penn Central) (defendant) brought a lawsuit against Penn Central. The shareholders alleged that Penn Central violated § 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by disseminating false and misleading financial information in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in an attempt to inflate the market price of Penn Central’s stock. Specifically, the shareholders alleged they did not sell their shares because Penn Central’s § 13(a) filings were falsely and misleadingly optimistic. Penn Central moved for partial summary judgment on the basis that the shareholders did not meet the standing requirements of § 18 of the act and that there is no implied right of action under § 13(a) for claims that do not satisfy § 18. The district court granted partial summary judgment against the shareholders on their § 13(a) claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rosenn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership