In re Pennaco Energy Shareholders Litigation
Delaware Court of Chancery
2001 Del. Ch. LEXIS 19 (2001)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The directors (defendants) of Pennaco Energy, Inc. (Pennaco) put the company up for sale. Based on their knowledge of the oil industry, the directors decided that it made more sense to negotiate with one bidder at a time than to solicit bids from the market in general. The directors struck a deal with Marathon Oil (Marathon), a major oil company that agreed to pay Pennaco’s shareholders substantially more than the pre-agreement trading value of Pennaco’s stock. Marathon agreed to let Pennaco walk away from the deal and accept any better offer from a subsequent bidder, with only a 3 percent termination fee. Dissident Pennaco shareholders (plaintiffs) accused the directors of having breached their Revlon duties by not soliciting bids from a wider range of potential buyers. The shareholders petitioned the Delaware Court of Chancery for a preliminary injunction blocking the Marathon merger.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.