In re Peterson
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 300 (1920)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The District Court for the Southern District of New York (District Court) appointed an auditor in Peterson’s case to conduct a preliminary hearing to determine the amounts due for coal sold and delivered. These amounts were necessary to make a determination in the case. The order appointing the auditor stated that the auditor would not “finally determine any of the issues in this action.” Peterson petitioned for a writ of mandamus, arguing that the District Court did not have the authority to appoint an auditor in this manner and that doing so violated his Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brandeis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.