Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re Petition of S.O.

Supreme Court of Colorado
795 P.2d 254 (Colo. 1990)


T.O. and her husband, S.O. (plaintiffs), filed a joint petition in juvenile court to permit S.O. to adopt T.O.’s biological son, E.E.F., whom T.O. had when she was unmarried and in a relationship with D.J.T., E.E.F.’s biological father. D.J.T. and T.O. had lived together for nearly three years after E.E.F.’s birth. Subsequently, T.O. ended the relationship with D.J.T. and married S.O. D.J.T. continued to maintain a relationship with E.E.F., visiting E.E.F. periodically. Several months later, T.O. and D.J.T. discussed the possibility of permitting S.O. to adopt E.E.F. Prior to completing the required form to consent to the adoption, D.J.T. and T.O. asked the court clerk whether the document could be altered to specifically provide that D.J.T. would be permitted to continue visitation with E.E.F. The court clerk stated that the form could not be altered. T.O. told D.J.T. that future visitation with E.E.F. would be permitted with her and S.O.’s consent. D.J.T. signed the consent form “as is” and submitted it along with the adoption petition. At a subsequent hearing that was not attended by D.J.T., the juvenile court granted the adoption. Thereafter, D.J.T. continued to visit E.E.F. After T.O. prevented the ongoing visitation, D.J.T. filed a petition to set the adoption aside. After a hearing, the juvenile court denied D.J.T.’s motion. D.J.T. appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mullarkey, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Quinn, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.