In re Petition of the Board of Directors of Compañia General de Combustibles S.A.

269 B.R. 104 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Petition of the Board of Directors of Compañia General de Combustibles S.A.

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
269 B.R. 104 (2001)

  • Written by Brett Stavin, JD

Facts

Sociedad Comercial del Plata, S.A. (SCP) (debtor) was an Argentine holding company that owned, among other entities, Compañia General de Combustibles S.A. (CGC) (debtor), which was an oil company, and Tren de la Costca (debtor), which was a transportation and entertainment company. On September 8, 2000, SCP, CGC, and Tren de la Costca all filed the Argentine equivalent of a bankruptcy petition, known as a concursos preventivos, in the federal commercial trial court in Buenos Aires, Argentina. In a concursos preventivos, the procedures were generally similar to a restructuring under Chapter 11. Reef Exploration, Inc. (Reef) and Hess Energy Trading Company LLC (Hess) (creditors), creditors of SCP and CGC, submitted claims to the Argentine court, but the Argentine court only admitted part of Hess’s claim, ruling that it could not admit Reef’s claim or Hess’s remaining claims without additional evidence. On December 28, the boards of directors of SCP and CGC filed an ancillary bankruptcy proceeding in United States bankruptcy court pursuant to § 304 of the Bankruptcy Code and moved for an order enjoining any action against SCP or CGC or their property in the United States. The United States bankruptcy court granted the motion on a preliminary basis. Reef and Hess argued that the injunction should not be continued under § 304(c), because they would not receive a distribution similar to what would be distributed under the Bankruptcy Code. Specifically, Reef and Hess argued that comity should not be given to Argentine law, because Argentine law did not include special protections for swap agreements similar to § 560 of the Bankruptcy Code. Whereas § 560 of the Bankruptcy Code allowed parties to a swap to terminate their agreement upon an event of bankruptcy, Argentine law gave the debtor 30 days to decide whether to continue executory contracts, such as swaps, during which time the debtor could not be penalized.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lifland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership