From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price Litigation
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
588 F.3d 24 (2009)
A class of patients (plaintiffs) who purchased Zoladex through Medicare Part B and paid for a portion of the cost themselves brought a lawsuit against AstraZeneca (AZ) (defendant) for fraudulently inflating the average wholesale price (AWP) of the drug. The AWPs were used to determine how much to reimburse providers when patients obtained the drugs. AZ inflated the AWPs to permit doctors to keep the difference between the higher reimbursement rate and the amount the doctors actually paid to purchase the drug. This was done to induce doctors to purchase this specific drug. Patients either had to pay 20% of the AWP as a co-payment or 4% if they had supplemental insurance that covered a portion of the co-payment. An expert calculated the damages to the class of patients as over $31 million. AZ and the class of patients agreed to settle the lawsuit for $24 million. The parties anticipated that a large portion of the settlement would go unclaimed because many of the patients were elderly or had died and some of the patients could not be found. To address this, the parties agreed that each plaintiff could collect double the actual amount of damages suffered. The parties also agreed that any funds not claimed, up to $10 million, would be placed into a cy pres fund that would pay the funds to a mutually acceptable charitable organization. One class representative, Joyce Howe, objected to the settlement and argued that more of the settlement amount should go to the patients that made claims. The trial court agreed and adjusted the settlement to pay treble damages to the plaintiffs with the strongest claims. Howe appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.