In re Phillip B.
California Court of Appeal
156 Cal. Rptr. 48 (Ct. App. 1979)
Twelve-year-old Phillip B. was born with Down’s Syndrome and a congenital heart defect. His parents (defendants) placed him a residential care facility. In 1973, a physician recommended that Phillip receive a cardiac catheterization to determine the severity of his heart problem. His parents initially refused but eventually agreed to catheterization in 1977. The procedure showed an extensive problem, and Phillip’s physician recommended surgery, without which Phillip would suffer an early death after a progressive decline. A second cardiologist confirmed that without the surgery, Phillip would live to age 20 at most. With it, his life expectancy would be substantially increased. The surgery bore genuine risks, however, due to Phillip’s Down’s Syndrome and the exacerbation of his heart condition during years of no treatment. There was a five-to-10 percent chance of death from the surgery and a higher risk of post-operative problems. Phillip’s parents refused to authorize surgery. A petition was brought, pursuant to a California statute, asking that Phillip be made a dependent of the court for the limited purpose of ensuring that he receive surgery. The court denied the petition, and an appeal was taken.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Caldecott, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.