In re Plymouth House Health Care Center
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2005 WL 2589201 (2005)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
In August 2001, SouthTrust Bank (SouthTrust) (creditor) loaned money to nursing-home operator Plymouth House Health Care Center (Plymouth) (debtor) and received a security interest in Plymouth’s assets. In September 2001, Plymouth entered into a loan and security agreement with Healthcare Business Credit Corporation (HBCC) (creditor) and gave HBCC a security interest in the same collateral as SouthTrust. HBCC entered into a subordination agreement with SouthTrust, pursuant to which SouthTrust agreed that HBCC had a first and priority interest in the collateral and SouthTrust’s interest was subordinate to HBCC’s. Plymouth subsequently filed for bankruptcy. At the time of the bankruptcy filing, the value of the collateral was more than what was owed to HBCC but much less than what was owed to SouthTrust. During the bankruptcy proceeding, a dispute arose regarding the effect of the subordination agreement between HBCC and SouthTrust. HBCC asserted that the subordination agreement meant that HBCC replaced SouthTrust as the first lienholder on Plymouth’s assets. The administrator of Plymouth’s reorganization plan contended that the subordination agreement did not change SouthTrust’s position as first lienholder and simply meant that SouthTrust had to pay to HBCC any funds SouthTrust received up to the amount of HBCC’s claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fox, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.