In re Quinn
Minnesota Supreme Court
517 N.W.2d 895 (1994)
On November 10, 1992, a 19-year-old woman filed a complaint alleging that she had been raped by Peter Daniel Quinn (plaintiff), a professional hockey player, in a hotel room in Bloomington, Minnesota. At the time of the alleged assault, the woman was accompanied by two of her friends and Quinn was accompanied by two of his teammates. Immediately following the woman’s complaint, the police commenced an investigation. As part of the investigation, the police obtained a search warrant for the hotel room and interviewed witnesses. Following the investigation, the police chief concluded that a sexual assault had occurred, and he recommended the prosecution of Quinn. However, the city attorney declined to press charges. Shortly thereafter, Quinn and his two teammates obtained a temporary restraining order that prohibited the city from releasing any information regarding the investigation to the public. Quinn asserted that, under the state’s open-records laws, he had the right to have his identity protected in order to prevent damage to property. Specifically, Quinn asserted a property interest in his professional reputation as a hockey star. The district court granted Quinn five days to file for an expungement. A number of media outlets then filed a motion to intervene, requesting access to the file. In addition, the alleged victim and her two friends requested to see the file and to have their names stricken. The district court denied the various motions to access the records and ordered the records to be expunged and the file to be sealed, and the court of appeals affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Coyne, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.