In re Resource Technology Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
662 F.3d 472 (2011)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Congress Development Company (CDC) owned and operated a landfill near Chicago. In 1996, CDC hired Resource Technology Corporation (RTC) (debtor) to build a gas-collection-and-control system for the landfill. The system deteriorated over the years, but RTC had no money to fix it. In 1999, RTC entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. In 2002, Samuel Roti (creditor) bought a hotel next to CDC’s landfill. In September 2005, RTC’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy was converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation. A trustee was appointed and given operational control over RTC’s business until the liquidation was complete. Four days after the trustee received control, the gas-collection-and-control system at CDC’s landfill failed. Gas odors wafted into Roti’s hotel, causing guests and employees to become sick. Illinois’s state environmental-protection agency issued notices of violations to RTC and CDC, but RTC’s trustee responded that there was no money in RTC’s bankruptcy estate to repair the gas-collection-and-control system. CDC terminated its relationship with RTC in January 2006, and the trustee abandoned all of RTC’s assets at the landfill the following month. Roti eventually sold the hotel for $5 million but claimed that he could have sold the hotel for nearly $25 million without the gas odors. Roti asserted an administrative claim in RTC’s bankruptcy case for the difference between the sale price and the price that Roti allegedly could have obtained for the hotel. The bankruptcy court rejected Roti’s claim, and the district court affirmed. Roti appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.