In re Riehlmann
Louisiana Supreme Court
891 So.2d 1239 (2005)
Lawyer Gerry Deegan told his friend and former colleague, lawyer Michael Riehlmann (defendant), that Deegan was dying of colon cancer. Deegan had once been a prosecutor but had transitioned to defense work. Deegan confessed to Riehlmann that Deegan had deliberately failed to disclose blood evidence in a case he had prosecuted many years earlier and that the evidence indicated that the defendant was not guilty. The defendant had ultimately been convicted and sentenced to die by lethal injection. Riehlmann was shocked by the statement and told Deegan to remedy the situation. However, Riehlmann was dealing with extensive personal issues and did not do anything else with the information. Two months later, Deegan died without doing anything about the hidden blood evidence. Five years later, shortly before the convicted defendant was scheduled to die, the defendant’s lawyer discovered the previously undisclosed blood evidence that arguably proved the defendant’s innocence. When Riehlmann heard about this, he contacted the defendant’s lawyer and executed an affidavit repeating what Deegan had told him about deliberately not disclosing the blood evidence. The next month, Riehlmann reported Deegan’s likely ethical violation to the office of disciplinary counsel (plaintiff). The disciplinary counsel charged Riehlmann with failing to report the violation earlier. There was a dispute about whether Riehlmann had known enough to be obligated to report Deegan’s violation and, if so, whether a significantly delayed report satisfied the obligation. The hearing committee ultimately recommended that Riehlmann be publicly reprimanded. However, the disciplinary board found that Riehlmann had clearly failed to meet his reporting obligation and suspended Riehlmann’s law license. Riehlmann appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.