In re Rivers

466 B.R. 558 (2012)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Rivers

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
466 B.R. 558 (2012)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Nicole Rivers (debtor) filed a petition for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2011. Before moving to Florida in 2010, Rivers lived in Virginia. Rivers still owned a home in Virginia at the time the bankruptcy petition was filed. The bankruptcy petition was accompanied by the Debtor’s Statement of Intention, in which Rivers indicated that her Virginia home was not claimed as exempt and would be surrendered. On Form 22A, which contained the means-test calculation, the deductions from Rivers’s income included the mortgage payments on the Virginia home. After subtracting all deductions from her total income, Rivers listed her monthly disposable income on Form 22A as $102.73. The United States trustee filed a motion to dismiss the case as an abuse of the provisions of Chapter 7. The trustee argued that the mortgage payment for the Virginia home should not have been deducted from Rivers’s monthly income in her means-test calculation. The trustee further argued that if the deduction were not allowed, Rivers’s disposable monthly income would equal approximately $2,595 per month, and the presumption of abuse would arise under § 707(b)(2) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glenn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership