In re Roth

577 A.2d 490 (1990)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Roth

New Jersey Supreme Court
577 A.2d 490 (1990)

RW
Play video

Facts

Lee B. Roth (defendant), a licensed New Jersey lawyer who did not have a real estate broker's license, undertook to help his paralegal buy a house for less than its listed price. The paralegal agreed to pay Roth's legal fee, and to let Roth describe himself in the sale contract as the seller's broker, and therefore entitled to half of the listing broker's commission. Roth was to take his share of the commission and turn it over to the paralegal to reduce her costs. The listing broker, Carl D. Bayuk (plaintiff), initially agreed to share his commission with Roth, but after selling the house to another buyer for more money than Roth offered, Bayuk filed an ethics complaint against Roth. The state ethics committee concluded that Roth had violated state Disciplinary Rule DR 1-102(A)(6), which prohibited a lawyer from engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer's fitness to practice law. The disciplinary review board affirmed the committee. The board recommended to the New Jersey Supreme Court that Roth be publicly reprimanded.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership