Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re Ryder

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
263 F. Supp. 360 (1967)


Facts

Agents for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) identified Charles Richard Cook as a suspect in the robbery of a Bank of Virginia branch office and seized $348 from his home. Cook called attorney Richard Ryder (defendant) for representation. Ryder spoke to the FBI and learned that the cash seized from Cook included bills known to have been stolen from the bank. Cook then told Ryder that he had taken up an offer from an unnamed individual to place a package in a bank box in exchange for $500. Ryder concluded that the FBI would eventually discover evidence of Cook’s guilt in the bank box. Ryder had Cook sign a power of attorney and rented a bank box in his own name. Ryder transferred the contents of Cook’s box, which included a bag of cash and a sawed-off shotgun. After Cook’s indictment on charges related to the robbery, FBI agents executed search warrants for both bank boxes. When the FBI discovered the sawed-off shotgun and stolen money in Ryder’s box, the district court suspended Ryder’s license to practice law, disqualified him as Cook’s attorney, and requested that the United States Attorney file criminal charges. During disciplinary proceedings, Ryder testified that he believed the FBI would eventually discover the evidence if it were left in Cook’s bank box and stated that he took possession of the evidence in order to create an opportunity to argue for inadmissibility under the attorney-client privilege. Ryder also testified that he intended to hand the money over to authorities once he determined that doing so would have no negative consequences for Cook. A disciplinary order issued subsequent to Ryder’s hearing.        

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.