In re S.E.G.

521 N.W.2d 357, 365 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re S.E.G.

Minnesota Supreme Court
521 N.W.2d 357, 365 (1994)

Facts

Indian children were at the center of a dispute about whether the children should remain in an Indian foster home or be placed in a non-Indian adoptive home. The trial court heard testimony from witnesses for both sides. The tribe proffered testimony from many qualified expert witnesses (QEWs). The non-Indian adoptive home proffered only two witnesses that it claimed were QEWs. The record established that both the Indian home and the non-Indian home met the children’s needs but that the non-Indian home could probably not meet the children’s cultural needs as successfully as the Indian home could. One QEW testified that a non-Indian family could meet the cultural needs of Indian children but did not testify that the children had extraordinary emotional needs. None of the QEWs testified that the children had extraordinary emotional needs that were not being met. Nevertheless, the trial court found that the children had extraordinary emotional needs.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Keith, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership