In re S.E.G.
Minnesota Supreme Court
521 N.W.2d 357, 365 (1994)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
Indian children were at the center of a dispute about whether the children should remain in an Indian foster home or be placed in a non-Indian adoptive home. The trial court heard testimony from witnesses for both sides. The tribe proffered testimony from many qualified expert witnesses (QEWs). The non-Indian adoptive home proffered only two witnesses that it claimed were QEWs. The record established that both the Indian home and the non-Indian home met the children’s needs but that the non-Indian home could probably not meet the children’s cultural needs as successfully as the Indian home could. One QEW testified that a non-Indian family could meet the cultural needs of Indian children but did not testify that the children had extraordinary emotional needs. None of the QEWs testified that the children had extraordinary emotional needs that were not being met. Nevertheless, the trial court found that the children had extraordinary emotional needs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Keith, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.