In re Salvini's Estate

397 P.2d 811 (1964)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Salvini’s Estate

Washington Supreme Court
397 P.2d 811 (1964)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1950, Jennie Klotsche, who was 90 years old, owned pastureland (the store property) that she wished to give to a married couple, Pete and Mary Salvini. Mary had been the executrix of Klotsche’s late husband’s will. Around the time that Klotsche wished to give the store property to the Salvinis, third parties Howard Gerritsen and his wife became interested in acquiring the then-vacant store property for the purpose of constructing a building and operating a store. Gerritsen could obtain a better interest rate on a construction mortgage if he owned the store property. An agreement was made and executed in which Klotsche conveyed the store property to the Gerritsens, who mortgaged it, constructed a building, and then conveyed title to the Salvinis, as husband and wife. The Gerritsens then leased the store property from the Salvinis. The Salvinis treated the store property as community property, and in 1958, when Mary executed a will, she did not list the store property as separate property. Mary later revoked all prior wills and died intestate, survived by Pete and Mary’s mother, Margaret Scanlon (defendant). Mary’s estate (plaintiff) sought to distribute the store property entirely to Pete, consistent with characterization as community property. Scanlon objected, arguing that the store property was Mary’s separate property and, as such, should be distributed in equal halves to Pete and Scanlon. The trial court found that the store property was community property and distributed it to Pete. Scanlon appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shorett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership