In re Scandinavian Bank Group plc

[1988] 1 Ch 87, [1987] 2 All ER 70, [1987] 2 WLR 752, [1987] BCLC 220, [1987] 1 FTLR 224, [1987] 3 BCC 93 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Scandinavian Bank Group plc

England and Wales High Court of Justice, Chancery Division
[1988] 1 Ch 87, [1987] 2 All ER 70, [1987] 2 WLR 752, [1987] BCLC 220, [1987] 1 FTLR 224, [1987] 3 BCC 93 (1986)

Facts

The Scandinavian Bank Group plc (bank) (plaintiff) was registered in England. The bank petitioned for approval to change its share capital to create four classes denominated in various currencies, i.e., classes of 30 million British pounds, 30 million United States dollars, 30 million Swiss francs, and 30 million German marks. The bank’s petition was unopposed, but the court obtained the appointment of an amicus curiae. The bank contended that its request complied with § 2(5)(a) of the Act of 1985 (1985 Act), which provided that a company must state (1) “the amount of the share capital” and (2) “the division of the share capital into shares of a fixed amount.” Regarding the first requirement, the bank argued that (1) pursuant to the Interpretation Act 1978 (Interpretation Act), the singular term “amount” also meant the plural term “amounts” because there was no contrary indication in the 1985 Act and (2) so construed, the bank could state its share capital in multiple currencies. The bank further argued that the fixed-amount requirement permitted the use of multiple currencies. Amicus noted statutory provisions that arguably required a company to state its share capital in British pounds, including the 1985 Act’s requirement that requisitionists have a paid-up average sum of £100. Amicus also argued that a “fixed amount” meant that each share must have a particular and unchanging value, which would not be the case if a company used multiple currencies. Additionally, Amicus observed that (1) at least 125 English-registered corporations used foreign-currency share capital, of which two likely used multiple currencies, and (2) no public authority objected to the use of multiple foreign currencies.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership