In re Sealed Case
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
825 F.2d 494 (1987)

- Written by Solveig Singleton, JD
Facts
A grand jury was convened to investigate some customers of a bank owned by the government of Country X (Bank X) (defendant). Bank X conducted business in Country Y and in the United States. A manager for Bank X (defendant) was familiar with the customers under investigation and their transactions. The manager had family and assets in Country Y but was a citizen of Country X and worked in the United States. The grand jury subpoenaed documents created and held by Bank X’s branch in Country Y and subpoenaed the manager’s testimony. Both Bank X and the manager declined to testify or produce documents relating to the banking activities of Bank X’s customers. Under Country Y’s bank-secrecy law, revealing customers’ bank information to anyone other than the customers was a crime. The lower court ordered the manager and Bank X to comply with the subpoena. Bank X and the manager refused on grounds of the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination and the principle of comity. Bank X and the manager noted that compliance would violate Country Y’s bank-secrecy law. The trial court found Bank X and the manager in civil contempt.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.