In re Seizure of $82,000 More or Less
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
119 F.Supp.2d 1013 (2000)
On February 15, 1996, Corporal Jack McMullin pulled over Roberto-Lopez and Guadalupe Cortez-Amezcua for speeding and following too closely. McMullin found fresh silicone along the undercarriage of their car and became suspicious. McMullin requested that Lopez-Velez and Cortez-Amezcua take the car to the state highway patrol garage for inspection. At the garage, Drug Enforcement Association (DEA) agent, Carl Hicks, uncovered $24,000 in cash hidden in the car’s battery case. Lopez-Velez revealed that the money was proceeds from the sale of drugs, and that he had been hired to transport the money. Hicks released Lopez-Velez and Cortez-Amezcua but seized the money and the car. Afterwards, the DEA initiated a forfeiture action against the money and the car. Lopez-Velez initially contested the forfeiture, but failed to pursue the challenge. Consequently, on June 12, 1998, the DEA declared the money and the car abandoned. The DEA subsequently arranged to have the car sold. On February 1, 1999, Helen Chappell (plaintiff) purchased the car. Noticing a fuel problem, Chappell arranged for Waldo Imports to repair the car. As he repaired the car, the mechanic found bundles of cash floating in the car’s fuel tank, totaling $82,000. The mechanic reported his discovery to the DEA and the DEA seized the money from the mechanic. Chappell and her husband filed for the return of the money while the Government (defendant) filed for forfeiture of the money as drug proceeds. The Chappells move for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Laughrey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.