In re Sofaer
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
728 A.2d 625 (1999)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
While serving as legal adviser in the United States State Department, Abraham Sofaer (defendant) took part in the department’s investigation of the 1988 bombing of Pan American Flight 103 over Scotland. As part of Sofaer’s work, he advised on the government’s response to Pan Am’s subpoena theorizing that the government had advance warning of the bombing but did nothing to stop it. Sofaer also attended confidential briefings on the status of the criminal investigation related to the bombing. Subsequently, Sofaer left the department for a private law firm. The Libyan government hired Sofaer and his new law firm to represent it in connection with litigation arising from the bombing. The District of Columbia Board of Professional Responsibility (plaintiff) opened an investigation into Sofaer’s conduct and charged Sofaer with violating District of Columbia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11(a), which prohibited an attorney from working on the same matter he or she had previously worked on for the government. The Board of Professional Responsibility directed bar counsel to formally admonish Sofaer. Sofaer appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Farrell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.