In re Stericycle Securities Litigation

35 F.4th 555 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Stericycle Securities Litigation

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
35 F.4th 555 (2022)

Facts

Stericycle, Inc. (defendant) was sued for securities fraud in a class action brought by the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi (pension fund) (plaintiff). Before the class action commenced, Stericycle settled similar claims brought by state investigators and private customers. Applying the procedures set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the district court appointed the pension fund as one of the lead plaintiffs in the class action and appointed the law firm of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (BLBG) as lead counsel. BLBG had contributed to the campaigns of elected officials who oversaw the pension fund. The class action settled for $45 million during the early stages of the litigation, before discovery. BLBG moved for attorney’s fees, seeking an award of 25 percent of the settlement amount. Mark Petri (plaintiff), a class member, opposed BLBG’s motion for attorney’s fees, arguing that the requested amount was unreasonably high. Petri also moved to conduct discovery regarding BLBG’s allegedly improper relationship with the pension fund. The district court approved the settlement and granted BLBG’s motion for attorney’s fees. The district court did not use the lodestar method to calculate the attorney’s-fee award and ignored the settlements reached in the prior lawsuits filed against Stericycle. The district court also denied Petri’s motion for discovery, finding that Petri’s allegations of an improper relationship between BLBG and the pension fund were unsubstantiated. Petri appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership