In re Succession of Plummer

847 So. 2d 185 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Succession of Plummer

Louisiana Court of Appeal
847 So. 2d 185 (2003)

Facts

Ronald Plummer filled out a preprinted form to create a revocable inter vivos trust. Had it been completed, the inter vivos trust would have operated similarly to a will. However, Plummer never completed all the steps needed to activate the trust. As part of the trust form, Plummer handwrote two pages of instructions for the trust’s assets. These instructions made sense only if read with the preprinted text on the form’s other pages. Read together, the typed and handwritten words directed Plummer’s siblings (defendants) to manage several of his assets in specific ways and left his retirement pension for his minor daughter, Cheronda Thomas (plaintiff). But the instructions were mostly for managing Plummer’s assets and did not clearly give many of these assets to anyone in particular. After Plummer died, Cheronda’s mother opened a probate proceeding and petitioned to have Plummer’s assets distributed using intestacy laws, contending that Plummer had not left behind a will. Plummer’s siblings responded with the two pages of instructions from the incomplete trust, claiming that the two pages operated as a holographic will. The trial court ruled that the document was not a valid holographic will. The siblings appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kostelka, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership