In Re Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
859 F.3d 637 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership (Sunnyslope) (debtor) owned an apartment complex financed by three loans conditioned on using the complex for affordable, low-income housing. To obtain financing and tax benefits, Sunnyslope entered regulatory agreements as well as covenants and restrictions that would bind future owners and terminate only on foreclosure. Sunnyslope defaulted in 2009. As guarantor, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development took over the loan and sold it to First Southern National Bank (First Southern) for $5.05 million. First Southern initiated foreclosure proceedings, and a state court appointed a receiver who agreed to sell the property to a third party for $7.65 million. Before the sale closed, Sunnyslope filed for Chapter 11 reorganization seeking to keep the complex under the “cram-down” option in the Bankruptcy Code that allows a reorganized debtor to keep the creditor’s collateral provided the debt is treated as secured to the extent of the value of the creditor’s interest in the collateral. The central issue was the value of the apartment complex. Sunnyslope argued the complex had to be valued as low-income housing, which its expert said resulted in a value of $2.6 million. First Southern argued the complex had to be valued without the housing restrictions. Its expert said that value was $7.74 million. The bankruptcy court valued the complex as low-income housing at $2.6 million. First Southern appealed to the district court, then the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hurwitz, J.)
Dissent (Kozinski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.